Trainer Prevails In Owner’s Lawsuit Over Failure To Claim Racehorse
A racing enthusiast sued his trainer for failing to claim a racehorse he wanted. The case went to trial in a Maryland state court with the trainer emerging victorious on all counts. The trial court’s ruling was affirmed on appeal. According to the appellate court’s decision,
Horse Trailer and Camper Not “Motor Vehicles” For Purposes of UIM Coverage
A South Carolina appellate court affirmed a trial court’s resolution of an insurance coverage dispute in favor of an insurance company that declined to offer underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage on an insured’s camper and horse trailer. The trial court had granted the insurance company
Montana Amends Its Equine Activity Liability Act To Require Specific Language In Liability Waivers
Montana recently enacted revisions to its equine activity liability act, providing for waivers of liability for participants in equine activities, and requiring waivers to include very specific language in order to be enforceable.
Horse Association Membership Application Is “All or Nothing” Proposition
Two Massachusetts-based harness-racing trainers sued the Harness Horsemen’s Association of New England, Inc. (“HHANE”), after their membership applications were rejected because they had crossed out language on the application form. The trainers had been members of HHANE for many years and previously served on its board. Over time, the trainers became dissatisfied with the organization and its contract negotiations with a local harness racing track operator.
Court Dismisses Carriage Drivers’ Lawsuit Against Animal Rights Groups
Controversy around the carriage horse industry in Charleston, South Carolina became heated when animal rights advocates used social media to disseminate video of carriage horses falling to the ground during a carriage tour in 2017. In response, Charleston Carriage Works, LLC filed suit against the Charleston Animal Society and Charleston Carriage Horse Advocates (and its president) alleging the information they had posted on the internet gave rise to claims for defamation, civil conspiracy, intentional interference with business relations and civil rights violations.
New York Court Reverses 2006 Ruling, Changing Law On Owner Liability For Harm Caused By Domestic Animals
A recent ruling from the Court of Appeals of New York has dramatically changed the New York law of negligence liability for harm caused by domestic animals. A 2006 case in New York held that there can be no common-law negligence liability when a domestic animal causes harm. That case significantly changed the landscape of animal liability law in New York by eliminating common law negligence claims